I am often asked why I choose one site over another.
Usually its because I see a topic forming within the
site. I only point out five elements of a site in each
newsletter so I like those elements to be cohesive. Many
of you have written and asked why I didnt say anything
about this or that. The reason is usually because it
didnt fit into the overall point I was trying to make.
Todays site jumped out at me as an example of frames
and why I am not a great fan of them. Im not saying one
shouldnt use frames. I have just found that it is the
rare designer that incorporates frames that can use them
to a true advantage.
Now the obligatory release clause statement...
>>>>The critique below represents the opinions of Joe
Burns, Ph.D. Feel free to disagree, argue, forget, or
accept anything he writes. The purpose of the critique
is to offer examples that you may use, repair, or forget
when it comes to your own Web site. As always, remember
that there are simply no hard or fast rules to Web
design. Any choice is the correct choice as long as
that choice aids the user and adds to the sites purpose
for being.<<<<
Loading Comments...